United States v. Henry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit November 18, 1982

United States v. Henry, 693 F.2d 31 (5th Cir. 1982)

Brown, Clark, Garwood, Gee, Ham, Higginbot, Johnson, Jolly, Politz, Randall, Reavley, Rubin, Tate, Williams

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 14, 1982, 5 Cir., 1982, 680 F.2d 403).

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOT-HAM, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the *32judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Reference

Full Case Name: United States v. Richard Bullock HENRY, a/k/a Imari Abubakari Obadele, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Wayne JAMES, a/k/a Offoga Quaddus, and Thomas Norman, a/k/a Hekima Ana
Cited By: 3 cases
Status: Published