U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1983

United States v. Herman Ackerman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 21, 1983 · Brown, Goldberg, Higginbotham, Per Curiam

719 F.2d 1282; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15110 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Linda Broocks (Court-appointed), Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant., Ronald C.H. Eddins, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Tri-State Hospital Supply Corp. (United States Court of International Trade 1999)
United States v. Rockwell International Corp. (United States Court of International Trade 1986)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion May 2, 1983, 5 Cir.1983, 704 F.2d 1344).

Before BROWN, GOLDBERG and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:.

Treating the suggestion for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, it is ordered that the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No . member of the panel nor Judge in regular active service of this Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. See United States v. Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324, n. 20 (5th Cir. 1983) (en banc) (1981).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.