Landry v. Hoepfner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit July 9, 1987

Landry v. Hoepfner, 822 F.2d 510 (5th Cir. 1987)

Clark, Davis, Garwood, Gee, Higginbotham, Hill, Johnson, Jolly, Jones, Politz, Randall, Reavley, Rubin, Williams

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 3, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987, 818 F.2d 1169)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *511The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Reference

Full Case Name: Philip LANDRY v. Judge J. Robert HOEPFNER and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published