U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1987

Landry v. Hoepfner

Landry v. Hoepfner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 9, 1987 · Clark, Davis, Garwood, Gee, Higginbotham, Hill, Johnson, Jolly, Jones, Politz, Randall, Reavley, Rubin, Williams
822 F.2d 510 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Landry v. Hoepfner

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 3, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987, 818 F.2d 1169)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *511The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.