Mary F. Phillips v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Meyer v. Sullivan (11th Cir. 1992)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion March 14, 1988, 5th Cir.1988, 839 F.2d 1075)
The petitioner, defendant-appellee Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, requests rehearing because he claims that the panel’s decision that the Secretary acted in bad faith in the case of Mary Phillips is based upon a factual error. See Baker v. Bowen, 839 F.2d 1075, 1087 (5th Cir. 1988). As he acknowledges in his petition, however, any error that may have occurred was caused by the Secretary’s own failure to present the argument now made in support of the petition, either on appeal or to the district court. It is simply too late at this juncture to present a new factual argument. For this reason the petition for rehearing is hereby
DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.