U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1988

United States v. Joe Alvin Anderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 3, 1988 · Clark, Gee, Rubin, Reavley, Politz, King, Johnson, Williams, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith

860 F.2d 166; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17015; 1988 WL 116397 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Paula C. Offenhauser, Frances H. Stacy, Don Degabrielle, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

The United States of America v. Joe Alvin Anderson (5th Cir. 1989)
United States v. Craig Williams, (87-1898) and Craig Defeyter, (87-1899) (6th Cir. 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*167 ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 15, 1988, 5 Cir., 1988, 853 F.2d 313)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en bane and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.