U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1988

Ali BOURESLAN-Appellant v. ARAMCO, Arabian American Oil Co. and Aramco Service Company-Appellees

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 23, 1988 · Clark, Gee, Rubin, Reavley, Politz, King, Johnson, Williams, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Duhe

863 F.2d 8; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18078; 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,681; 50 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 778; 1988 WL 137230 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James Field Tyson, Neal H. Paster, Perry Archer, Houston, Tex., for Boureslan., Charles A. Shanor, Vincent J. Black-wood, Karen MacRae, Attys., EEOC, Washington, D.C., for intervenor EEOC., Edward E. Potter, McGuiness & Williams, Washington, D.C., for amicus EEAC., John D. Roady, Linda Ottinger Headley, Hutcheson & Grundy, Houston, Tex., for Aramco., Lawrence Z. Lorber, John E. Parauda, Breed, Abbott & Morgan, Washington, D.C., for amicus ASPA., Cecil J. Olmstead, Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, D.C., for amicus Rule of Law Committee.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Mangosoft v. Oracle (District Court, D. New Hampshire 2006)
Matthews v. Automated Business Systems & Services, Inc. (D.C. 1989)
Quinn v. Austin (District Court, W.D. Washington 2023)
Asana Partners Fund II Reit 14 LLC v. Heath Family I LLC (District Court, W.D. Washington 2020)
Homer National Bank v. Namie (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH and DUHE, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestions for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.