U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1988

United States v. Jones

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 26, 1988 · Clark, Davis, Garwood, Gee, Higginbotham, Johnson, Jolly, King, Politz, Reavley, Rubin, Smith, Williams

844 F.2d 215; 1988 WL 36552 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Samuel Rosenthal, Chief, Appellate Section, Crim. Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Todd Foster, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for the U.S., Bernard Campion, Charles Campion, San Antonio, Tex., appellees pro se.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Monsanto (Supreme Court of the United States 1989)
United States v. Milton F. Jones, United States of America v. Charles Campion and Bernard Campion (5th Cir. 1988)
United States v. Peter Monsanto (2d Cir. 1988)
United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando Estevez (7th Cir. 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral *216argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.