U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1988

United States v. Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 21, 1988 · Gee, Hunter

859 F.2d 327; 1988 WL 108338 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

David H. Berg, Joel Androphy, Houston, Tex., for Drake Williams., Clyde W. Woody, Houston, Tex., for Vance Williams., Dick DeGuerin, Houston, Tex., for Oscar Silva., Robert S. Bennett, Houston, Tex., (court-appointed), for Edward Orellana., Michael E. Tigar, Austin, Tex., (court-appointed), for Michael Sahs., Edward A. Mallett, Jim Skelton, Houston, Tex., for Joseph C. Watson., George McCall Secrest, Jr., Houston, Tex., for Jan E. Grossman., Charles Louis Roberts, Joseph Abraham, Jr., El Paso, Tex., for Salvador Meraz., Ray Bass, Austin, Tex. (court-appointed), for Tanny Miller., Mervyn Hamburg, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., James R. Gough, Kenneth Magidson, Asst. U.S. Attys., Henry K. Oncken, U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Daniels (5th Cir. 2002)
United States v. Jimenez (5th Cir. 2001)
United States v. Edward Jimenez, Also Known as Big Eddie Paul Santivanez (5th Cir. 2001)
United States v. Cantu (5th Cir. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: **

The findings of the district court resulting from its Kastigar hearing are not clearly erroneous, and are dispositive. Grossman’s convictions are therefore

AFFIRMED.

This appeal is decided by a quorum, Judge Hill having died since the issuance of our earlier opinion. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.