U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1989

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Johnson & Cravens, 13911, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 20, 1989 · Rubin, Smith, Wisdom

867 F.2d 1517 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Earl Luna, Sydna H. Gordon, Dallas, Tex., for Carrollton-Farmers Branch., Christopher J. Caso, Kent S. Hofmeister, Hutchison, Price, Boyle & Brooks, Dallas, Tex., for City of Farmers Branch., Robert B. Wellenberger and Robert O. Lamb, Dallas, Tex., for FSLIC.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Johnson & Cravens (5th Cir. 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

We grant the appellee’s motion to clarify our decision in this case, 858 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1988), to the following extent. The sentence that reads:

In Bean v. Independent American Savings Association, [838 F.2d 739 (5 Cir. 1988)] this court acknowledged that the proviso in section 1730(k)(l) is an exception to the FSLIC’s otherwise exclusive jurisdiction to resolve claims against the FSLIC as receiver for a failed savings and loan association.1

is now modified to read:

In Bean v. Independent American Savings Association, this court acknowledged that the proviso in section 1730(k)(l) is an exception to the jurisdictional grant contained in that statute.

This court has no desire to enter a jurisdictional thicket that does not lie in the center of its path.

MOTION GRANTED.

. 858 F.2d 1010, 1012 (footnote omitted).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.