Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyerland Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit December 27, 1990

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyerland Co., 921 F.2d 55 (5th Cir. 1990)

Barksdale, Clark, Davis, Duhé, Garwood, Gee, Higginbotham, Johnson, Jolly, King, Politz, Smith, Wiener

Opinion of the Court

*56ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. A majority of the panel enjoined further proceedings in this cause in the state courts of Texas. Because it is necessary in aid of our jurisdiction, we continue that injunction pending the completion of en banc review. 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Reference

Full Case Name: In the Matter of MEYERLAND COMPANY and William M. Adkinson, Debtors. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION as Manager of the FSLIC Resolution Fund as Receiver for Continental Savings Association v. MEYERLAND COMPANY and William Adkinson
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published