David L. Masinter v. Marlin Drilling Company, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision. The 2 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Vaughn v. American Cml Barge Line (5th Cir. 2025)
- Art Midwest, Incorporated v. David Clapper (5th Cir. 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Appellant Masinter has filed a petition for rehearing in Masinter v. Tenneco Oil Company, 929 F.2d 191 (5th Cir. 1991) (Masinter II) and a motion to recall and reform the mandate entered in Masinter v. Tenneco Oil Company, 867 F.2d 892 (5th Cir. 1989) (Masinter I). The panel in Ma-sinter I recalled and reformed its mandate and instructed the district court to award Masinter interest on his award of future lost wages from the date of the first judgment.
In Masinter II this Court ruled that Ma-sinter could only recover interest on his award of future lost wages from the date of a second, modified judgment pursuant to the original mandate in Masinter I. Because of the reformation of that mandate we now grant Masinter’s petition for rehearing in Masinter II. We remand to the district court the issue relating to Masinter's interest award on future lost wages for further proceedings consistent with the reformed mandate in Masinter I.
We confirm and reinstate our prior opinion, 929 F.2d 191, in all respects not inconsistent herewith.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.