U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1991

United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Lance Jon Jordan

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 3, 1991 · Clark, Politz, King, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Duhé, Wiener, Barksdale, Garza

948 F.2d 934; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28441; 1991 WL 253909 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Jeb Loveless, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for Tarrant., James M. Murphy, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for Greer., J. Craig Jett, Dallas, Tex. (court-appointed), for Wood., R. Kristin Weaver, Dallas, Tex., for Jordan., Blake Withrow, Dallas, Tex., for Lawrence., David L. Botsford, Alvis, Carssow, Cum-mins, Hoeffner & Botsford, Austin, Tex., for amicus curiae, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Assoc., Lisa J. Stark, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Georgia v. McCollum (Supreme Court of the United States 1992)
Hargraves v. Capital City Mortgage Corp. (District Court, District of Columbia 2001)
Metoyer v. State (Tex. App. 1993)
U.S. v. Greer (5th Cir. 1992)
U.S. v. Kelly (5th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Marshall G. Peters and Linda Peters (9th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Lance Jon Jordan (5th Cir. 1992)
United States v. William M. Kelly (5th Cir. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 13, 1991, 5 Cir., 1991, 939 F.2d 1076)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.