U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1993

Fed. Carr. Cas. P 83,826 Advance United Expressways, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 22, 1993 · , Goldberg, Jolly, Wiener

990 F.2d 184; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9036; 1993 WL 124631 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Byron D. Olsen, Felhaber, Larson, Fen-Ion & Vogt, Barbara R. Kueppers, Minneapolis, MN, for Eastman Kodak., Nicholas J. DiMichael, Richard D. Fortin, Donelan, Cleary, Wood & Maser, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae — Nat. Indus. Transp. League., Judith A. Albert, Atty., I.C.C., Washington, DC, for amicus curiae I.C.C., Daniel J. Sweeney, McCarthy, Sweeney & Harkaway, Washington, DC, Paul 0. Taylor, Minneapolis, MN, David G. Sperry, Independence, MO, for amicus curiae— Health & Personal Care Dist. Conference, et al.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Admiral Marine Co., Inc. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1994)
Sunbelt Freight, Inc. v. Advanced Precision Fabricators, Inc. (In re Sunbelt Freight, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma 1994)
Jennings v. Tamaqua Cable Products Corp. (In re Roberts Carrier Corp.) (United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING & SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 26, 5th Cir., 1992 965 F.2d 1347)

Before GOLDBERG, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

To the extent that our opinion of June 26, 1992, 965 F.2d 1347, is in conflict with Reiter v. Cooper, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1213, 122 L.Ed.2d 604 (1993), it has been overruled. In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED. The case is thus REMANDED to the district court for further consideration in the light of Reiter and of our opinion.

Finally, no active judge having requested that the court be polled, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.