Earl Wayne Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corporation, Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit April 28, 1994

Earl Wayne Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corporation, Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E., 20 F.3d 614 (5th Cir. 1994)

1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9221; 1994 WL 157065

Politz, King, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Duhé, Wiener, Barksdale, Garza, Demoss

Opinion

ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Reference

Full Case Name: Earl Wayne COATS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. PENROD DRILLING CORPORATION, Et Al., Defendants, Penrod Drilling Corporation and Hytorc, M.E., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees
Cited By: 17 cases
Status: Published