McCallum Highlands, Ltd. v. Washington Capital Dus, Inc.
McCallum Highlands, Ltd. v. Washington Capital Dus, Inc.
70 F.3d 26; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32182; 1995 WL 683835
(Federal Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- St. Luke's Episcopal Hosp. v. GREAT WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE CO (District Court, S.D. Texas 1999)
- State v. Nakanelua (Haw. 2015)
- Realtime Data, LLC v. Packeteer, Inc. (District Court, E.D. Texas 2009)
- Green v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. (District Court, E.D. Texas 2006)
- Caudillo v. Lubbock Independent School District (District Court, N.D. Texas 2004)
- Johnson v. Waters (District Court, E.D. Texas 2004)
- David L. Aldridge Co. v. Microsoft Corp. (District Court, S.D. Texas 1998)
- Lowrey v. Texas a & M University System (District Court, S.D. Texas 1998)
- CICCorp., Inc. v. Aimtech Corp. (District Court, S.D. Texas 1998)
- Lain v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America (District Court, S.D. Texas 1998)
- North Star Steel Texas, Inc. v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. (District Court, S.D. Texas 1998)
- Hicks v. Brysch (District Court, W.D. Texas 1997)
- Hicks v. Bexar County, Tex. (District Court, W.D. Texas 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. We revise the last paragraph of the opinion to read as follows:
Based on the current record, McCallum apparently did not receive consideration for agreeing to the modification of the original loan commitment and a material fact issue exists regarding whether the modification was “fan’ and equitable.” Thus, the entry of summary judgment in *27 favor of Washington was error by the trial court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.