IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60188 Summary Calendar __________________

APOLO ROGELIO FLORES-CASTILLO,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A70-001-624 - - - - - - - - - - December 1, 1995 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is an appeal from the Board of Immigration Appeals'

(BIA) order dismissing appellant's petition for asylum and

withholding of deportation. He urges that he is entitled to

asylum or, alternatively, the case should be remanded to the BIA

so that he may present his petition with the assistance of

counsel. He requests that the court consider additional

* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. No. 95-60188 -2-

evidence which he did not submit during his deportation

proceedings.

This court's review is limited evidence included in the

administrative record. Miranda-Lores v. INS,

, 85 (5th

Cir. 1994). We have reviewed that record and the BIA's opinion

and find no error.

(a); Jukic v. INS,

(5th Cir. 1994). The appellant has failed to

demonstrate that remand is required in this case.

(c). If the appellant wishes to reopen his deportation

proceeding, he should file with the BIA a motion to reopen the

deportation proceedings for the submission of new evidence.

Faddoul v. INS,

(5th Cir. 1994); Pritchett v.

INS,

(5th Cir.), cert. denied,

(1993).

DENIED.