IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 94-20938 (Summary Calendar) __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

OSCAR MORENO SUAREZ a/k/a Oscar De Jesus Moreno,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (USDC No. CR-H-94-0060-4) - - - - - - - - - - December 15, 1995

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals his criminal conviction. He argues that the

Double Jeopardy Clause was violated and that wiretap evidence

should have been suppressed. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's grounds for denying the plea in bar to prosecution

and the motion to suppress. We find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. Appellant may not adopt arguments that had not yet been made by

persons who are not parties to the instant appeal. Fed. R. App. P.

28(i); United States v. Miles,

, 1138 n.3 (5th Cir.

1993).

AFFIRMED.

2