U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Heledoro-Rivera

United States v. Heledoro-Rivera
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 13, 1995

United States v. Heledoro-Rivera

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 94-50264 Summary Calendar _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAIME HELEDORO-RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. DR-94-CR-18) _________________________________________________________________ November 28, 1995 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's pro se motion entitled "Modification of Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(b)(2)", which the district court apparently treated as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Appellant argues that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, and that his counsel was ineffective. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's dismissal of the motion.

AFFIRMED. * Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.