Williams v. Rubin
Williams v. Rubin
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________
No. 95-60267 Summary Calendar _______________
BARBARA L. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
ROBERT E. RUBIN, Secretary of the Treasury,
and
FRANK GILBERT,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (1:93-CV-458) _________________________
December 1, 1995
Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Barbara Williams, who is black, worked for the Internal Rev-
enue Service and sued for race and sex discrimination, later
dropping her sex-based claim. She contends a white woman was
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well- settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. given a promotion over her because of race.
The district court conducted a full bench trial and found no
discrimination. We find no error in this decision. At trial,
Williams was the only witness for the plaintiff. She admitted
she knew of no reason she had not received the promotion except
that she had received a lower evaluation than did the woman who
was promoted. There was absolutely no evidence of racial animus
or motive.
Williams claims the district judge should have recused
because of a statement he made to the effect that he is audited
annually by the Internal Revenue Service and is friends with it.
Williams raised this for the first time on appeal, so she has
waived the issue. Moreover, the transcript does not contain the
statement that Williams claims was made, and the court reporter
has confirmed that the record is accurate in this regard.
Williams claims the district court improperly excluded a
statement by Williams’s manager. There is no showing that the
statement even referred to Williams, directly or indirectly.
Moreover, the statement does not refer in any way to race. The
district court was within its discretion in excluding the
statement.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished