IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 94-41085 Summary Calendar __________________

MACIEJ RYBICKI, BOGNA RYBICKI, KATARZYNA RYBICKI, AGATA RYBICKI, Petitioners, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals A28-990-182/183/184/185 - - - - - - - - - - December 20, 1995 Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The Rybickis petitioned this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing an appeal of the Immigration Judge's decision denying their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. They argue that there was not substantial evidence to support the BIA's conclusion that

* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

No. 94-41085 -2- reasonable persons in their circumstances would not fear persecution in Poland and that there was little likelihood of present or future persecution that would warrant asylum or withholding of deportation. We have reviewed the record and the BIA's decision and find that the evidence does not compel reversal of the BIA's determination. Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994).

PETITION DENIED.