Athas v. Runyon

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10059 (Summary Calendar)

PAUL A. ATHAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant, versus

MARVIN RUNYON, POSTMASTER,

GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL

SERVICE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3-92CV1327-X)

October 23, 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Paul Athas appeals to this court the district court’s judgment in favor of the Postmaster General, Marvin Runyon, dismissing with prejudice Athas’ Title VII claim alleging retaliation and race discrimination. Athas contends that the district court reversibly erred in (1) finding that Athas committed work rule infractions, (2) finding that the events at issue triggered the settlement agreement, (3) finding that Michael Allen was Athas’ immediate supervisor, (4) finding that there was no retaliation or race discrimination against Athas, and (5) crediting the testimony of Dorothy Robinson and not crediting the testimony of Michael Millican and Johnnie Berendt.

We have reviewed the record and briefs and perceive no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.