U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1996

Connor v. Marmolejo

Connor v. Marmolejo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 8, 1996

Connor v. Marmolejo

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10193 Conference Calendar

BILLY R. CONNOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CHARLES MARMOLEJO, CHARLES REED, J. KELLER, DALE BROWN, Warden, FCI, Big Spring, TX; SANDRA KAZ, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CV-135 - - - - - - - - - - October 24, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Billy R. Connor appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Connor’s § 1983 complaint is construed as an action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), because it alleges a civil rights violation by federal defendants. See Stephenson v. Reno, 28 F.3d 26, 26 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994). Connor contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. 96-10193 - 2 - because he raised genuine issues of material fact. We have reviewed the record and Connor’s brief and AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district court. Connor v. Marmolejo et al., No. 1:95-CV-135 (N.D. Tx. Jan. 29, 1996).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.