McCray v. Tolle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

McCray v. Tolle

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10491 Conference Calendar

DONALD RAY MCCRAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN B. TOLLE,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CV-460-G - - - - - - - - - - October 29, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald Ray McCray appeals the district court’s dismissal of

his civil rights complaint. This court must examine the basis of

its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v.

Cozby,

813 F.2d 659, 660

(5th Cir. 1987). Rule 4(a)(1), Fed. R.

App. P., requires that the notice of appeal in a civil action be

filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or order from which

appeal is taken. However, “[i]f an inmate confined in an

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-10491 - 2 -

institution files a notice of appeal in either a civil case or a

criminal case, the notice of appeal is timely filed if it is

deposited in the institution’s internal mail system on or before

the last day of filing.” Fed. R. App. P. 4(c).

The district court entered final judgment on March 21, 1996.

Therefore, the final day for filing a timely notice of appeal was

Monday April 22, 1996, because the thirtieth day was a Saturday.

See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a). McCray’s notice of appeal was dated

April 27, 1996, and was not filed into the court record until May

2, 1996. Thus, it could not have been deposited in the prison’s

mail system within the prescribed appeal period.

The time limitation for filing a notice of appeal is

jurisdictional, and the lack of a timely notice of appeal

mandates dismissal of the appeal. Robbins v. Maggio,

750 F.2d 405, 408

(5th Cir. 1985).

We remind McCray that in McRoy v. Lower, No. 96-20516 (Aug.

21, 1996), he was barred by this court from filing any pro se, in

forma pauperis civil appeal in this court, or any pro se, in

forma pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court which is

subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without the advance written

permission of a judge of the forum court or of this court, and

that the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal

district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to McCray,

unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. We

consider this appeal only because it was filed before this bar No. 96-10491 - 3 -

was imposed. To avoid additional sanctions McCray should review

any pending appeals and withdraw any frivolous appeals

immediately.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished