United States v. Humphrey
United States v. Humphrey
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-30578 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ZAIRE HUMPHREY,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CR-315-E - - - - - - - - - - November 25, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Zaire Humphrey appeals from his conviction for distribution
of cocaine, in violation of
21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Our review of
the record and the arguments and authorities convince us that no
reversible error was committed. Humphrey’s entrapment claim is
without merit because a reasonable jury could find, beyond a
reasonable doubt, that he was disposed to commit the criminal act
prior to first being approached by Government agents. See United
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-30578 - 2 -
States v. Sandoval,
20 F.3d 134, 137(5th Cir. 1994). Nor has
Humphrey shown that his Sixth Amendment right to confront the
Government’s witnesses was violated. See United States v. Pace,
10 F.3d 1106, 1113(5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied,
114 S. Ct. 2180(1994).
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished