Sutherland v. Larson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-40132 (Summary Calendar)
RONALD SUTHERLAND,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
UNIDENTIFIED LARSON, Dr.; UNIDENTIFIED WILSON, Warden; ANDY COLLINS, Director, TDCJ-ID,
Defendants-Appellees.
---------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (USDC No. 6:94-CV-684) ---------- October 23, 1996
Before Davis, Emilio M. Garza, Stewart, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ronald Sutherland, #665770, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Sutherland argues that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his deliberate-indifference, access-to-the-courts, and conditions-of- confinement claims.
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and perceive no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by the district court. See Sutherland v. Wilson, C.A. No. 6:94cv684 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 12, 1996). All other claims raised in Sutherland’s complaint and supplemental complaints and not raised in his appellate brief are abandoned. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.