Taylor v. Birhunko
Taylor v. Birhunko
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________
No. 96-20572 Summary Calendar _______________
EARL TAYLOR, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
JOHN M. BIRHUNKO, DOUG SHAVER, Judge, and DOUGLAS M. DURHAM,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-96-591) _________________________
December 6, 1996
Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Earl Taylor appeals the dismissal, as frivolous under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983prisoner's civil rights
complaint. We dismiss the appeal as frivolous.
Taylor's allegations call into question the validity of his
confinement and are barred by Heck v. Humphrey,
114 S. Ct. 2364(1994). Moreover, the state judge is entitled to absolute
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. immunity. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished