United States v. Fisher
United States v. Fisher
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-40045 Summary Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LEE ANTHONY FISHER, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (No. 1:95-CR-141) _________________________________________________________________ December 4, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Lee Anthony Fisher appeals his convictions for being a felon
in possession of a firearm and for possession of cocaine base with
the intent to distribute it, contending that the district court
should have granted his motion to suppress. We conclude that
Fisher failed to make a prima facie case that police officers
conducted an unannounced entry in violation of the Fourth Amendment
and that the district court did not commit clear error in finding
that the entry did not violate the “knock and announce” principle.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. See Wilson v. Arkansas, ___ U.S. ___,
115 S. Ct. 1914(1995);
United States v. Fike,
82 F.3d 1315, 1323(5th Cir.), cert.
denied, sub. nom. Douglas v. United States, cert. denied,
117 S. Ct. 241(1996); United States v. Mueller,
902 F.2d 336, 344(5th
Cir. 1990).
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished