U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1996

United States v. William Joseph Kirk

United States v. William Joseph Kirk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 5, 1996 · Politz, King, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Duhé, Wiener, Barksdale, Garza, Demoss, Benavides, Stewart, Parker, Dennis
78 F.3d 160; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4082; 1996 WL 101747 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. William Joseph Kirk

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 7, 1995, 5 Cir., 1995, 70 F.3d 791)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.