Ritter v. Hawthorne

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Ritter v. Hawthorne

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30672 Summary Calendar __________________

Wallace Ray Ritter,

Plaintiff-Appellee

versus

Ricky Hawthorne; Roger Smith,

Defendants,

and

The Village of Sun,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (CA-94-2249-E) ______________________________________________

January 15, 1996

Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Village of Sun, Louisiana, appeals from a denial of

summary judgment. Sun contends that it is protected from suit by

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 the Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no

reversible error. Sun is a municipal corporation in Louisiana, is

not an "arm of the state," and is not entitled to the immunity

afforded the State of Louisiana under the Eleventh Amendment.

Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by the

district court.

AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished