Ritter v. Hawthorne
Ritter v. Hawthorne
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-30672 Summary Calendar __________________
Wallace Ray Ritter,
Plaintiff-Appellee
versus
Ricky Hawthorne; Roger Smith,
Defendants,
and
The Village of Sun,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (CA-94-2249-E) ______________________________________________
January 15, 1996
Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:*
The Village of Sun, Louisiana, appeals from a denial of
summary judgment. Sun contends that it is protected from suit by
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
1 the Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution. We have
reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no
reversible error. Sun is a municipal corporation in Louisiana, is
not an "arm of the state," and is not entitled to the immunity
afforded the State of Louisiana under the Eleventh Amendment.
Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by the
district court.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished