U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Castaneda

United States v. Castaneda
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 13, 1996

United States v. Castaneda

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20699 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILLIAM CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-94-144-2 - - - - - - - - - - May 1, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* William Castaneda contends that the district court erred in increasing his offense level by two levels pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 3B1.1(c). Based upon a careful review of the record and the arguments of the parties, we hold that application of the § 3B1.1(c) adjustment was not clearly erroneous. United States v. Alvarado, 898 F.2d 987, 993-94 (5th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.