Wickware v. Collins
Wickware v. Collins
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-40942 Conference Calendar __________________
CLEMMIE R. WICKWARE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
JAMES A. COLLINS ET AL., Defendants, WILLIAM WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. G-92-CV-129 - - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* On February 29, 1996, this court barred filings by Clemmie Wickware except with judicial permission. Wickware v. Collins, No. 95-40641, slip op. at 2 (5th Cir. Feb. 29, 1996) (unpublished). One day earlier, Wickware filed the instant motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and for the production of a transcript at government expense in an unrelated
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
No. 95-40942 -2- appeal. We consider these motions because they were filed before the bar was imposed.
Our review of the motions and the record reveals that Wickware has failed to meet the requirements for IFP and for a transcript. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982); Harvey v. Andrist, 754 F.2d 569, 571 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1126 (1985). The appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Wickware is reminded that this court’s previously announced bar remains in effect and that he must seek permission from a judge to make any filings in any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.
MOTIONS FOR IFP AND A TRANSCRIPT DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.