U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1996

United States v. Munoz-Vallejo

United States v. Munoz-Vallejo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 9, 1996

United States v. Munoz-Vallejo

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-21109 Conference Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DONALDO MUNOZ-VALLEJO, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-95-220-ALL - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donaldo Munoz-Vallejo has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, the Federal Public Defender is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. -2- Cir. R. 42.2. The motion to substitute counsel on appeal is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.