United States v. Lindsey
United States v. Lindsey
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-40644 Conference Calendar __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GENE O. LINDSEY, Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:94-CR-57(2) - - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Gene O. Lindsey has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 396 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found no nonfrivolous issue.** Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. ** Lindsey filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to counsel’s Anders motion. This response was granted; however, Lindsey did not file a response.
No. 95-40644 -2- United States v. Jackson, 578 F.2d 1162, 1164 (5th Cir. 1978); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.