U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1996

Campbell v. Ruttiger

Campbell v. Ruttiger
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 9, 1996

Campbell v. Ruttiger

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10025 Conference Calendar

GLENN C. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RUTTIGER, Lt, Employee Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas; JOHN DOE, Employee, Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:93-CV-176 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Glenn C. Campbell, Texas state prisoner # 535319, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Campbell contends that Officer Ruttiger used excessive force, violating his Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment. We have reviewed the record and * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

No. 96-10025 - 2 - Campbell’s brief and AFFIRM the judgment. See Jackson v. Culbertson, 984 F.2d 699, 700 (5th Cir. 1993). Campbell’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED because Campbell’s appeal does not present "exceptional circumstances" that would require the appointment of counsel. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982).

AFFIRMED. MOTION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.