Rodriguez v. USA

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Rodriguez v. USA

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-41036 Summary Calendar

HORTENCIA RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT; SAN BENITO BANK AND TRUST COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-B-94-316 - - - - - - - - - - December 16, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Hortencia Rodriguez's application for

leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) is DENIED, because the

appeal is frivolous as a matter of law. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER

ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-41036 - 2 -

To obtain preliminary injunctive relief, a party must first

prove a substantial likelihood that she will prevail on the

merits of the action. Rodriguez v. United States,

66 F.3d 95, 97

(5th Cir. 1995). Rodriguez cannot prove this, because the

district court has dismissed her action with prejudice.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished