United States v. Wilson
United States v. Wilson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-10379 Summary Calendar __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHNNY DEWAYNE WILSON, also known as Wince,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CR-252-X - - - - - - - - - - February 24, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Johnny Dewayne Wilson appeals his convictions for conspiracy
to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base and for aiding and
abetting in the distribution of cocaine base within 1,000 feet of
a public elementary school. He complains of a material variance
between the evidence and the indictment, insufficiency of the
evidence, and the amount of cocaine attributed to him at
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-10379 -2-
sentencing. Our review of the record and the arguments and
authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed.
There was no variance between the indictment and the proof at
trial, and thus no clear or obvious error was committed by the
district court. See United States v. Calverley,
37 F.3d 160, 162(5th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied,
115 S. Ct. 1266(1995).
The evidence was not devoid of evidence pointing to Wilson’s
guilt. See United States v. Johnson,
87 F.3d 133, 136(5th Cir.
1996). Nor did the district court clearly err in determining the
quantity of drugs attributable to Wilson. See United States v.
Maseratti,
1 F.3d 330, 340(5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied,
510 U.S. 1129(1994).
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished