Urban v. Chater
Urban v. Chater
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-20794 Summary Calendar
SUSAN J. URBAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-4142 - - - - - - - - - - February 13, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Susan J. Urban appeals the district court's decision in
favor of the Commissioner, denying her disability insurance
benefits and Supplemental Security Income. Urban argues that the
Commissioner’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence
and that the Commissioner failed to apply the correct legal
standards.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-20794 - 2 -
The Commissioner applied the proper legal standards in
denying benefits to Urban. See
20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520, 416.920
(1995); Leggett v. Chater,
67 F.3d 558, 563 n.2 (5th Cir. 1995).
Further, a review of the record reflects substantial evidence
supporting the Commissioner’s decision. See Ripley v. Chater,
67 F.3d 552, 555(5th Cir. 1995).
Urban’s “Amended Motion for Remand Based on Incompetence of
Defendant’s Expert Witness” is DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished