Lovell v. Waits
Lovell v. Waits
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________
No. 96-30729 Conference Calendar __________________
MARY ANN LOVELL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
MIKE WAITS, Vice President; PLANTERS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 96-CV-1179-T - - - - - - - - - - February 20, 1997
Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mary Ann Lovell appeals the district court’s granting of
defendants’ motion to dismiss her complaint, in which she alleged
that they had interfered with her duties as an executor to an
estate and blocked her access to a safe deposit box. The
district court did not err in holding that it lacked subject-
matter jurisdiction over Lovell’s claims. Lovell has not raised
cognizable constitutional claims under
42 U.S.C. § 1983or Bivens
v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Investigation,
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-30729 -2-
403 U.S. 388(1971), because the defendants are not alleged to
have acted under color of either state or federal law. See
Morast v. Lance,
807 F.2d 926, 930-31(5th Cir. 1987). Moreover,
Lovell has not invoked the diversity jurisdiction of the court
because all of the parties are Louisiana citizens. See Getty Oil
Corp., Div. of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North Am.,
841 F.2d 1254, 1258-59(5th Cir. 1988);
28 U.S.C. § 1332.
This appeal is frivolous. It is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R.
42.2.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished