Johnson v. Unidentified Brown
Johnson v. Unidentified Brown
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________
No. 96-40740 Conference Calendar __________________
MARLEX LEJON JOHNSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNIDENTIFIED BROWN, Doctor, Gregg County Jail; UNIDENTIFIED SHIRLEY, Nurse/LVN, Gregg County Jail; UNIDENTIFIED BECKY, LVN, Gregg County Jail,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6-96-CV-97 - - - - - - - - - - February 20, 1997
Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Marlex Lejon Johnson, a Texas prisoner (# 683867), appeals
the magistrate judge’s dismissal of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983civil
rights complaint as frivolous, following an evidentiary hearing
pursuant to Spears v. McCotter,
766 F.2d 179(5th Cir. 1985).
The magistrate judge did not abuse her discretion either in
refusing to allow Johnson to amend his complaint after the
hearing or in allowing an attorney for the defendants to cross-
examine him during the hearing. See Adams v. Hansen, 906 F.2d
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40740 -2-
192, 194 (5th Cir. 1990); Wilson v. Barrientos,
926 F.2d 480, 483(5th Cir. 1991). Otherwise, the magistrate judge correctly ruled
that Johnson failed to state a cognizable claim that the
defendants were “deliberately indifferent” to his medical needs.
See Johnson v. Brown, et al., No. 6:96-CV-97 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 19,
1996).
This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous.
See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20(5th Cir. 1983).
Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2. We caution Johnson that any additional frivolous
appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition
of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Johnson is further cautioned
to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise
arguments that are frivolous.
DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished