Merrick v. E B R Parish Sch Bd
Merrick v. E B R Parish Sch Bd
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit
_____________________________________
No. 96-30438 _____________________________________
PATTY N. MERRICK,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD AND ROBERT WILLIAMS,
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (94-CV-2732) ______________________________________________________ March 10, 1997
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The district court correctly determined that plaintiff's suit
in this case was not timely filed and therefore her claim is time
barred. We agree with the district court that Ms. Merrick failed
to produce summary judgment evidence that supports her continuing
violation argument so as to avoid the 180-day limitation period to
file her charge with the EEOC.
For reasons stated by the district court, we agree that the
summary judgment evidence does not demonstrate independent
actionable conduct on the part of Williams that occurred during the
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. statutory period (the 180-day period between September 25, 1994 and
March 25, 1995). Moreover, the summary judgment evidence does not
demonstrate that Ms. Merrick did not know and could not reasonably
have been expected to realize that the 1992 sexual harassment was
actionable until September 1994. Plaintiff alleged that Williams
engaged in unwelcome touching of her breasts and thigh and engaged
in other obvious illegal conduct that should have put a reasonable
person in Merrick's position on immediate notice that she was a
victim of sexual harassment. Merrick does not suggest how later
events occurring within the limitations period were needed to alert
her to her rights to assert a claim with respect to the 1992
conduct.
AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished