Jackson v. Stinnett,et al
Jackson v. Stinnett,et al
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-20720 Summary Calendar
IRA JACKSON, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JOHN STINNETT; KENT RAMSEY; ROCHELLE MCKINNEY; JIM GANT,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CV-3505 - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The motion of Texas prisoner, Ira Jackson, Jr., # 378818,
for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal is
GRANTED.
Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), we
assess no initial partial filing fee against Jackson. However,
Jackson henceforth shall make monthly payments of twenty percent
of the preceding month’s income credited to his account. See 28
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-20720 - 2 -
U.S.C. § 1915(b). The agency having custody of Jackson is
directed to forward payments from his prisoner account to the
clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account
exceeds $10 until the appellate filing fee of $105 is paid. Id.
We have reviewed Jackson’s brief and the record and we hold,
for essentially the reasons set forth by the district court, that
Jackson’s suit was properly dismissed as frivolous. Jackson v.
Stinnett, No. H-95-CV-3505 (S.D. Tex. July 16, 1996). Jackson’s
appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous.
See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20(5th Cir. 1983).
APPEAL DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Reference
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Unpublished