Phelps v. Haney
Phelps v. Haney
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-10429 Conference Calendar
REID DARWIN PHELPS, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
LEE HANEY, HONORABLE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY 35TH JUDICIAL COURT,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CV-43-C - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Reid Darwin Phelps, Jr., Texas inmate # 824168, appeals the
dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915A. He argues that he was denied access to the
courts. We have reviewed Phelps’s brief and the record and agree
with the reasoning set forth by the district court. Phelps v.
Haney, No. 6:96-CV-043-C (N.D. Tex. April 18, 1997).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-10429 - 2 -
Phelps’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.
See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20(5th Cir. 1983).
Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2. Phelps is warned that any additional frivolous appeals
filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of
sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Phelps should review any pending
appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are
frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished