Taylor v. Puryear
Taylor v. Puryear
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-10747 Conference Calendar
FRENANDO RAY TAYLOR,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CECIL G. PURYEAR, Judge; SAM R. CUMMINGS, Federal Judge,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:97-CV-182-C - - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Frenando Ray Taylor, Texas prisoner # 535001, is BARRED from
proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) because, on at least three prior
occasions while incarcerated, Taylor has brought an action or
appeal in a United States court which was dismissed as frivolous.
Taylor v. Easley, No. 93-8847 (5th Cir. Aug. 12, 1994) (affirming
dismissal as frivolous in USDC No. W-93-CV-169); Taylor v.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-10747 -2-
Puryear, No. 97-10405 (5th Cir. Aug. 18, 1997) (affirming
dismissal as frivolous in USDC No. 5:96-CV-94); see
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons,
103 F.3d 383, 388(5th Cir.
1996). Accordingly, Taylor’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and he
may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he
is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious
physical injury.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Taylor has 15 days from the date of this order to pay the
full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district
court, should he wish to proceed with his appeal. Failure to pay
the filing fee in full will result in dismissal of Tyler’s
appeal. See 5th Cir. R. 42.3.1.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED IF FULL FILING FEE NOT PAID.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished