Lewis v. Conston
Lewis v. Conston
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-60125 Conference Calendar
JOHN W. LEWIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CLIDELL CONSTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS POLICE OFFICER IN AND FOR THE CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI; NED GARNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS POLICE OFFICER IN AND FOR THE CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI; CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:96-CV-529 - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John W. Lewis, Mississippi prisoner # 47286, appeals the
dismissal of his civil rights action. He contends that he was
arrested on the basis of a warrant procured by unlawful means,
and that his trial counsel was ineffective.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-60125 -2-
At the time that the district court considered his
complaint, Lewis’ state-court conviction was pending on direct
appeal. Lewis has no cause of action for damages under
42 U.S.C. § 1983regarding his state criminal proceedings until he can show
that his conviction has been invalidated. Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477, 487(1994). We affirm the district court’s dismissal
of Lewis’ damages claims.
Id.Lewis may not pursue his claims
until he satisfies the requirements of Heck. Johnson v.
McElveen,
101 F.3d 423, 424(5th Cir. 1996).
The district court did not err in dismissing Lewis’
injunctive claims without prejudice. Id.; see also, Alexander v.
Ieyoub,
62 F.3d 709, 713(5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished