White v. Cooper
White v. Cooper
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
No. 96-40266
(Summary Calendar) _________________
WILLIAM DEXTER WHITE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RONALD W COOPER ET AL.,
Defendants,
RONALD W COOPER; RONALD R REED,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas (9:91-CV-177)
October 7, 1997
Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Texas prisoner William Dexter White, # 545599, appeals the
denial of his motion for a new trial following the jury’s rejection
of his civil rights claims against Texas Department of Criminal
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Justice employees Sergeant Ronald Cooper and Dr. Ronald Reed.
Trial was held before a magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(c). White contends that he should have been granted a new
trial because the jury selection proceedings violated Batson v.
Kentucky;** jury misconduct caused the trial to be unfair; he was
denied adequate pretrial discovery; the jury was given erroneous
instructions; and, the jury’s verdict was inconsistent. Having
reviewed the record and White’s brief, we AFFIRM for essentially
the same reasons set forth by the magistrate judge. White v.
Cooper, No. 9:91cv177 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 1996). We reject White’s
argument that the appeal should be stayed until a transcript of the
entire trial has been provided to him and we find that the
magistrate judge accorded White a full and fair hearing on his
motion for a new trial.
AFFIRMED.
**
476 U.S. 79,
106 S. Ct. 1712(1986).
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished