Lofton v. Cain
Lofton v. Cain
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 97-30436 Summary Calendar _____________________
LARRY LOFTON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana,
Respondents-Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (96-CV-3635-E) _________________________________________________________________ December 15, 1997 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Louisiana prisoner Larry Lofton, # 99305, appeals the district
court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254. Of course, we must examine the issue of subject
matter jurisdiction on our own motion if necessary. Giannakos v.
M/V BRAVO TRADER,
762 F.2d 1295, 1297(5th Cir. 1985). Lofton’s
appeal is from the district court’s resolution of the merits of the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. claims he raised in a second, or successive, habeas petition. But,
the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA),
Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110Stat. 1214 (1996), requires that a prisoner
seeking to file such a petition first obtain an order from this
court authorizing the district court to consider such a petition.
See
28 U.S.C. § 2244(3)(A). Because Lofton did not obtain such
permission from this court, the district court was without
jurisdiction to entertain the petition. See
id.Accordingly, the
judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court
with instructions to dismiss the petition.
VACATED and REMANDED, WITH INSTRUCTIONS
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished