Lofton v. Cain
Lofton v. Cain
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 97-30436 Summary Calendar _____________________ LARRY LOFTON, Petitioner-Appellant, versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondents-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (96-CV-3635-E) _________________________________________________________________ December 15, 1997 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Louisiana prisoner Larry Lofton, # 99305, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Of course, we must examine the issue of subject matter jurisdiction on our own motion if necessary. Giannakos v. M/V BRAVO TRADER, 762 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1985). Lofton’s appeal is from the district court’s resolution of the merits of the * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. claims he raised in a second, or successive, habeas petition. But, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110
See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(3)(A). Because Lofton did not obtain such permission from this court, the district court was without jurisdiction to entertain the petition. See id. Accordingly, the judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition.
VACATED and REMANDED, WITH INSTRUCTIONS
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.