U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 1997

Sandra Jean Dale Boggs v. Thomas F. Boggs, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 20, 1997

121 F.3d 168; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22941 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

121 F.3d 168

Sandra Jean Dale BOGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas F. BOGGS, Harry M. Boggs and David B. Boggs,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-30178.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1997.

Marian M. Livaudais, Livaudais & Livaudais, Mandeville, LA, James F. Willeford, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Susan Rees, Plan Benefits Security Division, N-4611, Office of Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC, for Dept. of Labor, Amicus Curiae.

Thomas F. Boggs, Monroe, LA, Pro Se.

Guy L. Deano, Jr., Deano & Deano, Mandeville, LA, for Harry Boggs & David Boggs.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; A.J. McNamara, Judge.

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Before WISDOM, KING and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district court's order granting summary judgment in the above-styled action is VACATED. The case is REMANDED to the district court for proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's pronouncement in Boggs v. Boggs, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1754, 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.