United States v. Young
United States v. Young
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
No. 96-11521
(Summary Calendar) _________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LOUIS DEE YOUNG, JR,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas (3:95-CV-3135-R)
January 14, 1998
Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Louis Dee Young, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of
his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant
to
28 U.S.C. § 2255. Young argues that Lopez v. United States,
514 U.S. 549,
115 S. Ct. 1624,
131 L.Ed.2d 626(1995), has invalidated
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. his conviction, that federal jurisdiction was lacking because he
was not arrested on federally-owned land, that the indictment
against him was defective, that the trial court delivered improper
jury instructions, and that counsel was ineffective at trial and on
appeal.
We have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs. We find
no reversible error.
AFFIRMED.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished